Updated To Who Views this Blog

When I saw just how many views I get from outside of the United States, I found a Gadget on E Blogger that allows translation to a shit load of languages from around the world. Now you can reference this blog to people who do not speak English. The Translation gadget is now on "Challenging Christian Authority 1 and 2.  And my President Barrack Hussein Obama, Traitor to the Constitution, Blog.  It will be located on the right side of the page though you may have to scroll a little down. United States
Russia
United Kingdom
Ukraine
Germany
Canada
Australia
France
South Korea
Malaysia

Trinidad and Tobago

Bahamas Switzerland Macedonia [FYROM] China India Taiwan Australia Iraq Denmark Italy Venezuela New Zealand Singapore Brazil Armenia Poland Turkey Indonesia Egypt Bangladesh Bosnia and Herzegovina Austria Netherlands Mexico Spain Slovenia Netherlands South Africa Puerto Rico Norway Romania Philippines Saudi Arabia Fiji Portugal Czech Republic Israel Czech Republic Australia Jordan Israel Kenya Ireland Greece Colombia Honduras Georgia

 

Challenging Christian Authority 2

http://challengingchristionauthority2.blogspot.com/

Barrack Hussein Obama, Traitor to the Constitution

http://presidentbarackhusseinobamatraitor.blogspot.com/

The Myths concerning the Tower of Babel, and Sodom and Gomorrah

Genesis 11:4 And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, [lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth].

The people of Babel believed that if they did (not) build a city and the tower they would be scattered across the face of the earth. But in building their city and their tower they were cursed by god, and scattered across the face of the earth. And had their one language changed to many languages.

So why did god curse the people of Babel, was it because they were building a tower that could reach heaven? Was it because they were sinning or doing something wrong? No it was because all of mankind with one language came together to accomplish a united goal.

Gen. 11:5 And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded.Gen. 11:6 And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now [nothing will be restrained from them], which they have imagined to do.

god did not curse the people of babel because of their arrogance, or because they were sinning, he cursed them because all of mankind came together with one language to accomplish a single goal, and he cursed them to prevent mankind from ever coming together ever again to accomplish a universal goal. He cursed mankind to eternal warfare and strife.

Gen. 11:7 Go to, [let us] go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.Gen. 11:8 So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.

Now what ties Babel and Sodom and Gomorrah together is Peleg, it was in Peleg generation that the city and tower of Babel was begun. Here is some back ground information.

As I enter into the era of Abram (Abraham) please keep in mind, only about 315 years have passed since the flood.From Noah to the birth of Abram is 11 generations, Noah is still alive and will live approximately 35 more years.From the tower of Babel to Abram is only six generations, Peleg is still alive 25 years after Abram’s birth, it was in Peleg’s generation that the tower of Babel was begun.

Now Christian Zealots claim that Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed because of homosexuality but as I have just shown the people of Sodom and Gomorrah were the children and grand children and great grand children of the people of Babel. People that god had cursed for no reason. If the children of the people of Babel rejected god for the evil that he did to their parents that would explain their reactions to the Angels.

Genesis 19:1 And there came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground; Gen 2 And he said, Behold now, my lords, turn in, I pray you, into your servant's house, and tarry all night, and wash your feet, and ye shall rise up early, and go on your ways. And they said, Nay; but we will abide in the street all night.

Now working from the premise that the people of Sodom and Gomorrah rejected the evil god that cursed their parents. If Lot was seen kneeling and bowing his head to the ground respecting the Angels, and was seen doing it, don't you think that someone might be curious as to who these men were?

The city elders would probably want to know if Angels of the evil god were in their city. And if not Angels someone important enough for Lot to bow to them and call them my lords. That alone would be enough reason for the city elders to inquire after the strangers.

And when Lot knowing that the people of the city rejected the evil god did not want them to meet the Angels of the evil god. But when he offered up his virgin daughters to be raped this so enraged the city elders that they were going to do harm to Lot as well as the Angels of the evil god.

And Lot Gen. 19:6 went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him,Gen. 19:8 Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.Gen. 19:9 And they said, Stand back. And they said again, [This one fellow came in to sojourn, and he will needs be [a judge]: now will we deal worse with thee, than with them

The city elders specifically said of one of the strangers (he will needs be a judge). It sounds like he knew they were angels of the evil god, keep in mind Peleg and Noah have only been dead maybe 40 years or so. So the people of Sodom and Gomorrah were well versed on the evil god who murdered every man women and child on the face of the world except for Noah and his family.

On the evil god who scattered mankind all over the face of the earth and changed the one language into many languages. Ensuring that mankind would never again know universal peace would never again come together as one people for a single effort.

This makes far more sense then the (The Homosexuals did it).

Simple Ways to Refute Christian Claims

One of the most common claims made by Christians is about their bible being the inerrant truth of their god. A simple keyword search for "Bible Contradictions" will bring up a numerous list of web pages dedicated to Bible contradictions and inconsistencies.

In this Blog itself I have three contradictions dealing with Jesus's Youth, the Sepulcher, and the Virgin Birth prophecy, which all by its self invalidates Christianity. Once faced with these obvious errors and fallibility's in their bible their next claim is that the divine truth and the divine nature of the bible can only be known through the holy ghost assistance in the interpretation of the bible.

Which is just as easily shot down, Christianity's claims Universal Applicability and Universal Authority. But for this claim to be valid then the bible would have to be inerrant and infallible, which of course it is not.

Now their claim that only the holy ghost can guide one to the divine truths of the bible and that the Atheists cannot claim knowledge of the bible because they do not have the holy ghost to help them to interpret it. This argument does not apply to me since I am a Polytheist who accepts the existence of Gods and of Faith and divinely inspired knowledge.

But even an Atheist can shoot this one down, if the divine truth and divine nature of the bible can be known only through the holy ghosts assistance in interpreting it, then every single interpretation by every single person must be the exact same interpretation for it to be considered Universally Applicable.

And since there are dozens if not hundreds of christian cults all claiming the sole ownership of the divine truth, there is no Universal interpretation of the divine truth, heck there are dozens if not hundreds of versions of the bible in existence. Also showing that there is no Universal Interpretations of the divine truth to be found in the bible.

One of my favorite christian claims is the description of this monotheist god of theirs. That this god has existed before creation itself and in fact brought about creation with its spoken words. That this god is unchanging for all of its existence with one name, image and persona.

Now while the belief that a 15 billion plus year old god who is unchanging for its entire 15 billion plus year existence who did absolutely nothing but sit on its thumbs for 99.99 percent of its existence until 3,800 years ago when it appeared for the first time to Abraham is patently unbelievable.

What is equally unbelievable is the belief that a single living god has existed and has interacted with mankind since its creation and yet in the 200,000 plus year history of modern humans no record of this single living god can be found anywhere in human history prior to Abraham's invention of it in 1,800 BCE.

We can document nature beliefs, spirit beliefs almost to the beginning of modern man, we can document the Earth Mother or Goddess Beliefs back to 40,000 years BCE and later other Godhood beliefs. But we cannot document this single living god any earlier then 1,800 BCE.

If there truly is a single living god then that single living god who is unchanging over its 15 billion plus year life should be represented throughout human history, all of mankind should have originated from a single monotheist belief centered upon this unchanging god.

While there is a Christian scholar who claims that there was a "first source" monotheist belief some 4,000 to 5000 years ago the scholar fails in two primary ways, the first is his claim that Polytheist beliefs were created from the first belief by the Sons of Noah, each son creating an off shoot from the first belief.

His other failure is in not proving what the first source was, for Judaism and Christianity to prove that they are actually the first source they would have to prove that the first monotheist belief was based upon Jehovah so the claim of an unchanging god could be used. But the Christian scholar was unable to say what the first source belief was or what it was based upon.

And if Christianity nor Judaism can establish themselves as the first source, then they would be like all other beliefs and are just offshoots of the first source. Plus this Christian Scholar ignores the fact that religious beliefs existed tens of thousands of years prior to the time that he claims the first source actually existed.

And for Christianity claiming an unchanging god is mandatory, after all how can someone claim divine authority and Universal Applicability if they acknowledge that god has appeared with many different names, images and beliefs and has created many different beliefs.

The only way for Christianity to claim Universal Applicability and Universal Authority is to claim that god in its over 15 billion year old existence has never changed or appeared differently then it does now. Which is of course ludicrous.

Christianity was able to be considered a valid belief because for most of its existence the science, history or knowledge to challenge it did not exist. And their determined extermination of anyone who questioned their authority.

Luckily those days have long since passed.

Challenging "Under God" and "In God we Trust"

While I am not a lawyer I do have over a decade long background in challenging the Christian Religion, their beliefs and doctrines. And how to get around their claimed authority, examples would be in the “In God We Trust” and “Under God” issues. These so called motto's have not been successfully challenged because the courts have ruled that “God” is generic and is applicable to other religions.

The problem with this is that while the word God is applicable to all monotheist beliefs it is not applicable to many other beliefs. Hinduism is the third largest religious belief, Buddhism, Wiccans, Pagans, Nature and Spirit beliefs. There are many more beliefs that do not acknowledge a monotheist deity.

Also something to take into account is that of the Monotheist beliefs only Christianity has the Doctrine of the trinity. Christian doctrine is that God and Jesus are one in the same, so when a Christian reads “In God We Trust” they are thinking “In Jesus We Trust” or “Under Jesus”.

The easiest way to challenge these two things is not by claiming it is a Government endorsement of Christianity. But they are a Government endorsement of Monotheist beliefs over non monotheist beliefs. Having these Motto’s clearly shows that monotheist beliefs are superior to all non monotheist beliefs.

Invalidating the Hindu belief and Buddhist beliefs and the other beliefs listed above. These motto's can and should be challenged and thrown out based upon this premise. Similar challenges should be made concerning any secular law whose primary purpose is to enforce a Christian belief.

Contradictions of the Sepulchre

According to John, Mary Magdalene was by herself when she went to the tomb and the stone was already moved away. That the Disciples did not know before hand that Christ was to rise from the dead. Christ appears to the disciples twice in Jerusalem and once on the sea of Tiberius, and I assume that Christ was raised up, at the end of John at the sea of Tiberius.

According to Matthew, Mary Magdalene and another Mary went to the tomb. That an angel of God caused a great earthquake and moved and then sat on the stone. Christ did not appear to the disciples in Jerusalem, he appeared to them once at a mountain in Galilee. I assume that Christ was raised up, at the end of Matthew at the mountain

According to Mark, two Mary’s went to the tomb, the stone was already moved away. The disciples did not believe Mary and did not go to the mountain that they were told to go to. Christ appeared to them in Jerusalem and not at the mountain as he wanted, Christ then chewed them out for not believing Mary and the two other disciples. Christ was raised up in Jerusalem.

According to Luke, there were many women who went to the tomb, the stone was already rolled away. While in the tomb two angels appeared to all the women and told them to remember what Christ had told them in Galilee. The apostles did not believe the women. Jesus then appears to the apostles and leads them out to Bethany where he is raised up. The disciples then return to Jerusalem.

So which of these four Saints are telling the infallible truth of God, they cannot agree on, whether or not they knew before hand that Christ was supposed to rise from the dead or who went to the tomb, or what happened there. They cannot agree on where Christ first appears to them, or what happened when he did. They cannot agree on where Christ ascended or if he actually ascended at all. They cannot agree on what his instructions to them were.

The Christians have murdered, persecuted and harassed others because these Saints spoke only the infallible truth of God. The Saints did not speak with the authority of God, or his Son, The spoke on the authority of Satan. No one who has a relationship with the Father and Son can look at these four different accounts of the resurrection and believe that they are the infallible truth of God. These accounts are Satan’s truth, not God’s truth.

Isaiah 5:20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! V21 Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!

By claiming that these verses are the Gospel of God, the priesthood is claiming that evil is good and good is evil, the same thing that the Jewish priesthood was doing. So if the Christian Priesthood does the same things that the Jewish Priesthood did, how can they be any better.